The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Torrey Pines Biolabs
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef

Index of Online Supplemental Material for
J. Exp. Med. 10.1084/jem.20070679
Gebhardt et al.

Figure S1 Differences in the size and grade of wt and Rage−/− tumors.

Figure S2 Rage−/− tumors show reduced levels of BrdU- and phospho–c-Jun–positive tumor cells and less infiltrating innate immune cells.

Figure S3 Initiation with DMBA does not affect the response to single TPA treatment in wt and Rage−/− mice.

Figure S4 Expression of proinflammatory proteins in chemically induced tumors.

Figure S5 Impaired expression of proinflammatory proteins in TPA-treated skin.

Figure S6 Dermal infiltration and epidermal hyperplasia in Rage−/− mice is restored by accelerated TPA treatment.

Figure S7 Impaired epidermal hyperplasia of Rage−/− skin after DMBA/TPA treatment.

Figure S8 S100a8, S100a9, and RAGE expression in different cell types of chemically induced skin tumors.

Figure S9 Tnf-α protein levels in tumor sections derived from the accelerated carcinogenesis protocol.

Tables S1 and S2 (PDF)





This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS