|
||
BRIEF DEFINITIVE REPORT |
CORRESPONDENCE James P. Di Santo: disanto{at}pasteur.fr
|
|
|---|
chain (
c) are necessary for their generation. By directly comparing Rag2–/–
c–/y, Rag2–/–IL-2Rß–/–, Rag2–/–IL-15–/–, and Rag2–/–IL-2–/– mice, we demonstrate that IKDC development parallels NK cell development in its strict IL-15 dependence. Moreover, IKDCs uniformly express NK-specific Ncr-1 transcripts (encoding NKp46), whereas NKp46+ cells are absent in Ncr1gfp/+
c–/y mice. Distinguishing features of IKDCs (CD11cloB220+MHC-II+) were carefully examined on developing NK cells in the bone marrow and on peripheral NK cells. As B220 expression was heterogeneous, defining B220lo versus B220hi NK1.1+ NK cells could be considered as arbitrary, and few phenotypic differences were noted between NK1.1+ NK cells bearing different levels of B220. CD11c expression did not correlate with B220 or major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II (MHC-II) expression, and most MHC-II+ NK1.1+ cells did not express B220 and were thus not IKDCs. Finally, CD11c, MHC-II, and B220 levels were up-regulated on NK1.1+ cells upon activation in vitro or in vivo in a proliferation-dependent fashion. Our data suggest that the majority of CD11cloB220+ "IKDC-like" cells represent activated NK cells. During innate and adaptive immune responses, NK cells and DCs appear to play distinct, complementary, and synergistic roles. NK cells, by virtue of their capacity to respond without prior sensitization, can directly eliminate infected or transformed target cells and elaborate soluble factors (cytokines and chemokines) that recruit and amplify the inflammatory response. DCs, in contrast, are the sentinels that, once activated, take up antigen, mature, and migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, where they present the processed antigen to naive T cells to initiate the adaptive immune response. In addition, DCs and NK cells can interact in a reciprocal fashion that results in the mutual activation of both types of cells (for review see reference 1). Mature DCs can prime NK cells to enhance their functional capacities (2), whereas activated NK cells secrete IFN-
that up-regulates antigen presentation in DCs and can "edit" DC responses through the elimination of immature DCs (3, 4). In this way, NK cells and DCs represent two highly specialized cell types that interact in a complementary fashion. This cellular strategy could provide an additional level of control, because complete immune responses would not be efficiently achieved by activation of either cell type in isolation.
Recently, the functional dichotomy of DCs and NK cells has been challenged with the characterization of a hybrid cell subset called IFN-producing killer DCs (IKDCs) (5, 6). IKDCs were characterized as CD3–CD19– cells with a CD11cloB220+ phenotype and were clearly distinguished from plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) because of the absence of Ly6C (Gr-1) expression (5). CD11cloB220+Gr-1– cells expressed NK1.1 and CD49b in addition to other NK cell surface markers (NKG2D and Ly49 family receptors), and like DCs, they expressed co-stimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86) and MHC class II (MHC-II) (5, 6). Moreover, initial reports demonstrated that IKDCs possess NK cell–like cytotoxicity and inducible IFN-
production, as well as a DC-like ability to secrete IFN-
and to stimulate transgenic OVA-specific T cells (5, 6). Based on these observations, IKDCs appear to represent a hybrid effector cell that can act both as the "assassin" (NK cells) and as the "messenger" (DCs).
Although the evidence for dual IKDC function was clearly demonstrated at the population level (i.e., in the CD11cloB220+ subset), it could not be rigorously ruled out that IKDC activities were simply the additive property of two distinct cell types that shared a CD11cloB220+ phenotype. Neither CD11c nor B220 are DC-specific markers, as B cells express B220 and activated B cells and CD8 T cells, and most NK cells were shown to express CD11c (7–10). Only a minor fraction of IKDCs was able to produce type I IFN upon stimulation in vitro (5), and direct evidence that the same cell can produce both IFN-
and IFN-
is still lacking. Moreover, recent reports have challenged the idea that IKDCs secrete IFN-
upon stimulation (11, 12), suggesting that minor pDC contamination in IKDC purification may have accounted for the type I IFN detected in a previous report (5).
Concerning their development from hematopoietic precursors, IKDCs appeared to have a truly unique cytokine dependency, because they were not detected in mice lacking the IL-2Rß chain (required for IL-2 and IL-15 receptor function), whereas they were present in mice lacking the common
chain (
c; required for IL-2, -4, -7, -9, -15, and -21 receptors) (5, 6), suggesting the existence of a new IL-2Rß–dependent,
c-independent signaling pathway. Alternatively, IKDCs could also be IL-2Rß independent but might be missing from IL-2Rß–/– mice secondary to the intense inflammatory syndrome that these mice develop (13). Lastly, genetic background differences in the mice analyzed could explain the divergent results.
Considering their curious developmental, phenotypic, and functional qualities, we have analyzed the development of "IKDC-like" cells (the CD11cloB220+ subset) using a series of C57BL/6 mice deficient in selected cytokines and their receptors. Using mice that report expression of the NK cell–specific NKp46 molecule (Ncr-1gfp/+ mice) (14), we demonstrate that IKDC-like cells are developmentally related to NK cells and share their IL-15 dependence. Moreover, many of the distinguishing features of IKDC-like cells (B220, CD11c, and MHC-II expression) are inducible in NK cells. Our results challenge the view that IKDC-like cells belong to a separate DC lineage but provide evidence that the majority of these cells resemble activated NK cells.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
c–/y mice but not in IL-2Rß–/– mice (5, 6). These surprising results suggested the existence of a novel il2rg-dependent but il2rb-dependent signaling pathway that promoted IKDC development. Alternatively, the absence of IKDCs in IL-2Rß–/– mice could have resulted from the inflammatory syndrome that these mice develop with age (13). To address these possibilities, we examined the CD11cloB220+ subset in Rag2–/– mice that were deficient or not in the
c or IL-2Rß chains (Fig. 1 A).
All mice were backcrossed onto the C57BL/6 background and carried the Nkrp1c B6 allele (allowing detection by NK1.1). We found that all mice had similar absolute numbers of BM CD11cloB220+ cells but that the deficiency in
c or IL-2Rß completely ablated development of NK1.1+ or CD49b+ cells within the CD11cloB220+ subset (Fig. 1 A). Analysis of splenocytes from these mice yielded similar results (Fig. 1 B). To determine which IL-2Rß–dependent ligand was driving IKDC development, we further analyzed Rag2–/–IL-2–/– and Rag2–/–IL-15–/– mice. The CD11cloB220+NK1.1+ subset was present in the former but not the latter (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20071451/DC1), confirming the essential role for IL-15 in the development of all NK1.1+ cells (15).
|
c (Fig. 1 C). NKp46 expression was not detected in pDCs (Fig. 1 C) or conventional DCs (cDCs; not depicted) under any condition.
A recent report indicated that IKDCs in
c-deficient mice differed from IKDCs in C57BL/6 mice in that they were NK1.1– but expressed CD49b (19). We therefore studied the NK1.1–CD49b+ cells that were equally present in the BM of Rag2–/–, Rag2–/–IL-2Rß–/–, and Rag2–/–
c–/y mice (Fig. 1 D). Compared with NK1.1+CD49+ cells (of which a fraction expressed the CD11cloB220+ phenotype), NK1.1–CD49b+ cells lacked CD11c and B220 expression (Fig. 1 C). Thus, NK1.1+ cells with the CD11cloB220+ phenotype (IKDC-like cells) require IL-15 for their development and express NKp46; these are characteristics of bone fide NK cells.
B220 expression on developing and mature NK cells
We studied further the expression of B220 by cells of the NK cell lineage. NK cell precursors were essentially B220–, whereas a minor population of immature NK cells were B220lo (Fig. 2 A).
In contrast,
10-30% of mature NK1.1+CD49b+ NK cells in the BM and spleen clearly expressed B220 in a rather homogeneous fashion (Fig. 2, A and B). Because B220 expression on peripheral NK cells was not bimodal, we consider it arbitrary to designate B220– versus B220+ NK cell subsets, as others have done (5, 6). Examining the phenotypes of NK1.1+ cells bearing low versus high levels of B220 (Fig. 2 B), the frequency of NK cells expressing Ly49 receptors (A, C/I, G2, or D) or CD94 was not substantially different. B220+ NK cells were uniformly CD62Lhi and had slightly higher expression of CD11c (Fig. 2 B), although CD11c expression was not bimodal. In contrast, the overall density of CD11b was reduced on B220+ NK cells. No differences in the expression of NKG2D, CD49b, and CD44 were found between B220– and B220+ NK cells (unpublished data).
|
production after stimulation in vitro with IL-2 and IL-12 or IL-2 and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN; Fig. 2 C). Moreover, IFN-
production did not correlate with CD11c expression (Fig. 2 C). However, when stimulated with pharmacological agents (PMA plus ionomycin), we found that CD11c+ or B220+ NK cells produced somewhat more IFN-
than CD11c– or B220– NK cells (Fig. 2 C). Collectively, these results fail to support the notion that B220hi cells represent a distinct phenotypic and functional NK1.1+ NK cell subset.
Activation-induced changes in B220, CD11c, and MHC-II expression in NK cells
MHC-II expression has been proposed as a defining characteristic for CD11cloB220+ IKDC-like cells (5). Consistent with a previous report (5), few splenic NK cells (CD3–NK1.1+) from C57BL/6 mice expressed MHC-II molecules on their cell surface under steady-state conditions (Fig. 3 A).
The highest proportion of MHC-II+ cells among CD3–NK1.1+ cells could be detected in the lymph nodes (10–50%), although a subset of MHC-II+ NK cells in the BM was detected (Fig. 3 A). Surprisingly, only a minority of MHC-II+ NK cells coexpressed B220, and in the tissues examined, MHC-II and B220 expression on NK cells was not correlated in an obvious fashion (Fig. 3 A). Similar results were obtained when examining coexpression of B220 and CD86 on NK cells (unpublished data). These results argue against the existence of a widely distributed IKDC-like NK1.1+ cell that coexpresses B220 and MHC-II (5, 6).
|
30–50% of NK cells from poly I:C– or CpG ODN–treated mice became IKDC-like (Fig. 3 B). The increase in CD11c+B220+ NK cells was likely caused by up-regulation of these markers rather than by preferential proliferation of CD11cloB220+NK1.1+ cells, because Ki67 expression (a marker of cells undergoing cell division) was predominantly found in NK1.1+B220neg cells (unpublished data). Interestingly, MHC-II expression was increased on all NK cells in mice treated with CpG ODN but only in lymph node NK cells in mice receiving poly I:C treatment (Fig. 3 C), suggesting a differential threshold for induction of MHC-II on NK cells after activation in this tissue. As for the case with resting NK cells (Fig. 3 A), no direct correlation could be made with inducible MHC-II expression in NK cells expressing different levels of B220 (not depicted). These results suggested that CD11c, B220, and MHC-II behave as classical activation markers on NK cells, although their inducible expression is differentially controlled. Finally, increased CD86 expression paralleled inducible MHC-II expression (unpublished data). Collectively, these results show that mouse NK cells appear to closely resemble human NK cells in their inducible expression of MHC-II and co-stimulatory molecules (20).
NK cell proliferation increases B220 expression in vitro and in vivo
To understand the mechanisms and dynamics of inducible B220 expression by NK1.1+ cells, we labeled total splenocytes from Rag2–/– mice with CFSE and cultured them in IL-2. B220 expression on NK1.1+ cells was analyzed daily in relation to cytokine-induced proliferation. During the first 2 d, most NK cells divided asynchronously, as indicated by the even dilution of CFSE in the bulk NK cell population, which was accompanied by an increase in B220 expression (a twofold increase in mean fluorescence intensity). By days 3 and 4, a clear fraction of NK cells had further proliferated, and their B220 expression was approximately fivefold higher than that observed on NK cells at the start of the culture. Similar results were obtained in IL-2–supplemented cultures of lymph node– or thymus-derived NK cells (Fig. 4 A and not depicted).
All IL-2–cultured NK cells demonstrated increased expression of NK1.1, CD11c, and B220 (unpublished data), suggesting that cytokine-induced proliferation can generate an IKDC-like phenotype from resting NK cells.
|
To further investigate the proliferation-induced B220 expression on NK cells, we purified splenic B220– and B220+NK1.1+ cells from Rag2–/– mice, labeled them with CFSE, and adoptively transferred them into NK cell–deficient Rag2–/–IL-2Rß–/– recipient mice. The analysis of CD11c expression by the sorted B220– and B220+ NK cells confirmed that both populations expressed CD11c, with B220+ NK cells expressing slightly higher CD11c levels (Fig. S2, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20071451/DC1). Both NK cell populations underwent "homeostatic" proliferation (21–23) based on their CFSE-dilution profiles. Although B220+ NK cells maintained B220 expression, the B220– NK cells became B220+ (Fig. 4 C). We next assessed whether B220 induction on B220– NK cells was proliferation dependent by transferring CFSE-labeled B220– and B220+ NK cells into NK cell–proficient (B–, T–, and NK+) Rag2–/– recipients. Most transferred NK cells did not divide in these hosts (Fig. 4 C), likely because of competition with endogenous NK cells for cellular resources such as IL-15 (22). Under these conditions, B220– NK cells remained B220–, whereas B220+ NK cells maintained B220 expression (Fig. 4 C). Lastly, we assessed the effects of TLR engagement on the fate of adoptively transferred B220– NK cells in Rag2–/– recipients. In contrast to untreated Rag2–/– mice, B220– NK cells proliferated in poly I:C–treated Rag2–/– recipients, with concomitant up-regulation of B220 expression (Fig. 4 C). Thus, B220 expression is up-regulated on proliferating NK cells in vivo. These results suggest that TLR ligands may modify NK cell activation states through stimulation of NK cell proliferation.
T cell stimulatory activity of B220+ and B220– NK cells
Peptide-pulsed CD11cloB220+NK1.1+ cells were reported to stimulate antigen-specific T cells (5), suggesting that IKDCs could function as APCs to stimulate adaptive immune responses. We next assessed whether T cell stimulatory activity was a unique property of B220+ NK cells. "Marilyn" TCR-transgenic cells specific for the male antigen Dby presented by I-Ab (24) were used as responder cells. Female Rag2–/– mice were injected with CpG ODN, and 3 d later, B220+ NK cells, B220– NK cells, pDCs, and cDCs were isolated. Cells were pulsed with the Dby peptide, and pulsed and nonpulsed cells were cultured with sorted, CFSE-labeled Marilyn T cells. After 5 d, T cell proliferation was assessed by CFSE dilution. Both B220+ and B220– NK cells were able to stimulate division of
30% of Marilyn CD4+ T cells (Fig. 5).
Nevertheless, CpG-activated NK cells were clearly less efficient than either pDCs or cDCs in their T cell stimulatory capacity. This result contrasts with a previous study that demonstrated B220+ NK cells to be more efficient than pDCs in T cell stimulation (5). The difference may lie in the choice of a TCR-transgenic mouse model (OT-II vs. Marilyn) that may differ in activation threshold.
|
c, IL-2Rß, and IL-15) and express the same NK cell–specific genes (NKp46). These features clearly distinguish NK cells from diverse DC subsets. We also demonstrate inducible B220 and CD11c expression after NK cell activation in vitro and in vivo. The capacity of NK cells to express high levels of CD11c after activation in vivo might explain the increased frequency of intratumoral CD11c+NK1.1+ cells detected in patients treated with imatinib mesylate and IL-2, as reported by Taieb et al. (6). Similarly, their activated status would explain why B220+NK1.1+ cells isolated from these patients exhibit an increased functional competence in vitro and in vivo (6). Other markers suggested to be specific for CD11cloB220+NK1.1+ cells, such as MHC-II and CD86, were clearly not confined to these cells but were also expressed by B220lo/– NK cells in naive mice. Some of these activation-induced phenotypic changes (acquisition of B220) are closely linked to cellular proliferation. Up-regulation of B220 and CD11c has been previously detected on activated NK T cells and CD8+ T cells (10, 25). As such, these "atypical" markers may signal recent cytokine stimulation, thereby representing a conserved mechanism that operates in cytotoxic cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
c (Rag2–/–
c–/y), in the IL-2Rß chain (Rag2–/–IL-2Rß–/–; provided by S. Koyasu, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan), in IL-2 (Rag2–/–IL-2–/–), or in IL-15 (Rag2–/–IL-15–/–) on the C57BL/6 background have been previously described (15, 26). Mice carrying a GFP reporter in the NK cell–specific Ncr-1 locus (Ncr1gfp/+) have been previously described (14), and male Ncr1gfp/+ mice were crossed to female Rag2–/–
c–/– mice to create
c-deficient Ncr1gfp/+ male mice. C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories. Mice were maintained in specific pathogen-free conditions at the Institut Pasteur and were used at 4–10 wk of age. Mouse experiments were approved by an institutional committee at the Institut Pasteur and validated by the French Ministry of Agriculture.
Antibodies and reagents.
mAbs directly conjugated to FITC, PE, PE-Cy7, PerCP-Cy5.5, PE-Cy5.5, allophycocyanin, allophycocyanin-Cy7, or biotin specific for the following antigens (clone name in parenthesis) were used: B220 (RA3-6B2), CD3 (145-2C11), CD11b (M1/70), CD11c (N418 and HL3, respectively), CD19 (1D3), CD49b (DX5), CD62L (MEL14), CD86 (GL1), CD94 (18d3), CD122 (TM-ß1), I-A/I-E (M5/1 14.15.2), Ly49A (JR9), Ly49G2 (4D11), Ly49C/I (5E6), NK1.1 (PK136), PDCA-1 (PDCA-1), and IFN-
(XMG1.2). Antibodies were purchased from Becton Dickinson, eBioscience, Biolegend, and Miltenyi Biotec. The polyclonal goat anti–mouse anti-NKp46 serum was purchased from R&D Systems. FCS and PBS were purchased from Invitrogen.
Isolation of lymphoid cells and flow cytometric analysis.
Single-cell suspensions from the BM, spleen, lymph nodes, and thymus and FACS analysis were performed using a flow cytometer (FACSCanto or FACSCanto II; Becton Dickinson) with FACSDiva software (5.02; Becton Dickinson), as previously described (27). Datasets were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.). Cell sorting was performed on a cell sorter (FACSAria, BD Biosciences; access was provided by the Flow Cytometry Platform at the Institut Pasteur).
Adoptive transfer of sorted NK cell subpopulations.
Splenic cell suspensions from Rag2–/– mice were sorted as NK1.1+CD49b+B220+ or B220– cells and injected i.v. into alymphoid recipients. At the given times after transfer (as shown in the figures), splenic lymphocytes were prepared, and their phenotype was determined. Alternatively, cells were labeled with CFSE after sorting, injected i.v. into Rag2–/– or Rag2–/–IL-2Rß–/– mice, and analyzed 3 d later.
In vitro cultures.
Splenic cell suspensions from Rag2–/– mice were labeled with 5 µm CFSE, and 1–2 x 105 cells per 200 µl were cultured in flat-bottom microtiter plates in 1,000 U/ml IL-2 (PeproTech). For co-cultures of Marilyn T cells with NK cells or IKDC-like cells, we sorted NK1.1+B220– and NK1.1+B220+ cells from female Rag2–/– mice and incubated half of the sorted cells with 100 nM Dby peptide. 2 x 104 of the sorted cells were cultured with CFSE-labeled Vß6+CD4+ T cells from Marilyn Rag2–/– transgenic mice (28) at a 1:1 ratio. As controls, we co-cultured Marilyn T cells with sorted NK1.1+B220– and NK1.1+B220+ cells that had not been incubated with peptide, and with sorted pDCs and cDCs from the same female Rag2–/– mice. CpG ODN–activated cells were obtained from Rag2–/– mice that received 35 µg CpG ODN (i.p.) 3 d earlier.
In vivo activation.
Rag2–/– or C57BL/6 mice were injected i.p. with either CpG ODN 1668 (S-oligo; Sigma-Proligo) or poly I:C (Sigma-Aldrich). At the time points indicated in the figures, cells from the indicated organs were isolated and analyzed.
Online supplemental material.
Fig. S1 shows an overlay of NK1.1+CD49b+ NK cells on a CD11c versus B220 dot plot of viable BM cells derived from Rag2–/–, Rag2–/–IL-2–/–, and Rag2–/–IL-15–/– mice. Fig. S2 shows the expression of B220 and CD11c by sorted B220+ and B220–NK1.1+CD49b+ splenocytes from Rag2–/– mice. Online supplemental material is available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20071451/DC1.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Institut Pasteur and the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, and as an Equipe Labelisé of the Ligue National Contre le Cancer.
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
Submitted: 13 July 2007
Accepted: 24 September 2007
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ßTCR+CD4–CD8– and
-
TCR+CD4–CD8– cells. J. Exp. Med. 179:1957–1972.This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|