The Journal of Experimental Medicine
BioSymposia
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coggeshall, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, O. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coggeshall, L. T.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, O. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 61, 213-234, Copyright, 1935, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York


ARTICLE

A STUDY OF REPEATED ATTACKS OF EXPERIMENTAL PNEUMOCOCCUS LOBAR PNEUMONIA IN DOGS

Lowell T. Coggeshall M.D.1 and O. H. Robertson M.D.1

1 From the Department of Medicine and the Douglas Smith Foundation for Medical Research of The University of Chicago, Chicago

A study has been made of repeated attacks of experimental lobar pneumonia in the dog produced by the intrabronchial injection of Pneumococcus Type I. Twenty-five individual dogs were given 78 infections in all at intervals of 3 days to 19 months. The number of attacks to which a single animal was subjected varied from two to eleven. It was found that recovery from this experimental disease conferred on the animal increased resistance against subsequent infections as shown by the fact that such animals regularly survived doses of culture which in the dog infected for the first time produced a fatal outcome. The recurrent attacks of pneumonia were uniformly mild in character; the febrile course was brief; the pulmonary lesion was usually confined to a single lobe, and bacteremia seldom occurred. There was no detectable difference between the second and the subsequent infections, which could be produced whenever desired, nor did the time intervals between attacks appear to bear any relationship to the severity of the experimental disease. Tests for acquired antipneumococcal immune substances in the blood after recovery showed their presence in some animals and not in others, yet dogs without demonstrable humoral immunity appeared to be just as resistant to reinfection as those possessing it.

A comparison of the pathogenesis of these secondarily induced lesions with those of the initial infection revealed certain striking differences between the two. Secondary lesions produced in the lobe previously affected tended to evolve much more rapidly than did the primary ones. They were characterized by the early appearance of a generalized macrophage reaction and a marked diminution in the numbers of pneumococci in the tissues or their complete absence. These changes occurred more slowly in secondary lesions initiated in hitherto uninvolved lobes. The macrophage reaction, which consists of a swelling of the fixed tissue cells (histiocytes) and a subsequent liberation of macrophages into the alveolar exudate, is regarded as a significant evidence of increased antipneumococcal resistance, since it has been observed to occur regularly at the time of recovery from the first infection and is accompanied by the local disappearance of the invading microorganisms.

Submitted on November 18, 1934


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS