|
||
Brief Definitive Report |
Correspondence to: Kenneth M. Murphy, Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel:314-362-2009 Fax:314-747-4888 E-mail:murphy{at}immunology.wustl.edu.
Although interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-4 polarize naive CD4+ T cells toward T helper cell type 1 (Th1) or Th2 phenotypes, it is not known whether cytokines instruct the developmental fate in uncommitted progenitors or select for outgrowth of cells that have stochastically committed to a particular fate. To distinguish these instructive and selective models, we used surface affinity matrix technology to isolate committed progenitors based on cytokine secretion phenotype and developed retroviral-based tagging approaches to directly monitor individual progenitor fate decisions at the clonal and population levels. We observe IL-4dependent redirection of phenotype in cells that have already committed to a nonIL-4producing fate, inconsistent with predictions of the selective model. Further, retroviral tagging of naive progenitors with the Th2-specific transcription factor GATA-3 provided direct evidence for instructive differentiation, and no evidence for the selective outgrowth of cells committed to either the Th1 or Th2 fate. These data would seem to exclude selection as an exclusive mechanism in Th1/Th2 differentiation, and support an instructive model of cytokine-driven transcriptional programming of cell fate decisions.
Key Words: GATA-3, instruction, stochastic, T lymphocytes, cytokine
This article has been cited by other articles:
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|