The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Janeway's Immunobiology 7th Edition
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 472K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Keng, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Keng, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 164, 156-164, Copyright © 1986 by Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Lymphoma models for B cell activation and tolerance. III. Cell cycle dependence for negative signalling of WEHI-231 B lymphoma cells by anti- mu

DW Scott, D Livnat, CA Pennell and P Keng

WEHI-231 B lymphoma cells have proven to be a useful model for the regulation of growth of normal B cells by anti-Ig reagents. We previously reported that the growth of these lymphoma cells is inhibited by heterologous or monoclonal anti-mu or anti-kappa reagents. Such cells cease to incorporate thymidine within 24-48 h of exposure to anti-Ig reagents, but are not adversely affected by antibodies directed at either class I or class II histocompatibility antigens. In fact, cell cycle analysis revealed that anti-mu causes a block in the transition of these cells from G1 to S phase. To further study the mechanism of growth inhibition, we have purified lymphoma cells in G1 by centrifugal elutriation, or enriched WEHI-231 cells at the G1/S interface by treatment with hydroxyurea, and followed their progression through the cell cycle in the presence or absence of anti-mu. Our data show that WEHI-231 B lymphoma cells receive a negative signal early in G1, since delayed addition of anti-mu (to late G1 cells) leads to no alteration in cell cycle progression at 24 h, and exposure to anti-mu during S does not alter progress through DNA synthesis and mitosis. Moreover, exposure to anti-mu for only 2 h prevents purified G1 cells from entering their first S phase. The nature of the relevant processes in early G1 is discussed in terms of models of B cell activation and tolerance induction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS