The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Torrey Pines Biolabs
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ozato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ozato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 143, 1-14, Copyright © 1976 by Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Concanavalin A potentiates syngeneic response in murine lymphocytes

K Ozato and JD Ebert

In an attempt to modulate the recognition processes that occur on lymphocyte membranes in mixed lymphocyte culture, responding cortisone resistant thymocytes or stimulating spleen cells (treated with mitomycin C) were pretreated with native concanavalin A (N-Con A) or succinyl-Con A (S-Con A). Highly significant cell proliferation was observed in syngeneic combinations when either the responding cells or the stimulating cells were so treated with Con A, although Con A pretreatment alone was never mitogenic. In allogeneic combinations the proliferative response with Con A pretreatment of either partner on day 3 was five to seven times higher than in the normal mixed lymphocyte reactions. The triggering of proliferation was dependent on two factors: (a) The presence of spleen cells as the stimulating cells (thymocytes were much less effective). (b) The binding of Con A molecules to either one of the partners, the effect being abrogated by the specific inhibitor of Con A, alpha-mannopyranoside. The optimal concentration of S-Con A was about twice that of N-Con A. Even more striking was the observation that cultures in which either one of the partners was pretreated with Con A in allogeneic combinations showed a strong suppression (60-80% inhibition) in the subsequent generation of the cytotoxic lymphocytes (CL). The Con A concentration required to trigger a proliferative response corresponded to that for suppressing the generation of CL. Con A pretreatment did not result in a cytotoxic activity toward syngeneic tumor cells.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS