The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Janeway's Immunobiology 7th Edition
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Basten, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beeson, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Basten, A.
Right arrow Articles by Beeson, P. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 131, 1271-1287, Copyright © 1970 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLE

MECHANISM OF EOSINOPHILIA : I. FACTORS AFFECTING THE EOSINOPHIL RESPONSE OF RATS TO TRICHINELLA SPIRALIS



Antony Basten M.B.1, Markley H. Boyer M.D.1, and Paul B. Beeson M.D.1

1 From the Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England

The phenomenon of eosinophilia was studied in rats using inoculation with Trichinella larvae as the experimental stimulus. Comparisons were made between the eosinophil response accompanying active infestation via the gastrointestinal tract and that resulting from parenteral inoculation of larvae or their products.

A vigorous eosinophilia could be provoked by a single intravenous injection of intact parasites. In this circumstance the larvae lodged in the lungs causing an acute inflammatory reaction which led to their disintegration within 24 hr. Intraaortic injection also produced a significant response, whereas inoculation of the same number of parasites by the intramuscular, intraperitoneal, or subcutaneous routes did not cause eosinophilia. Eosinophilia likewise failed to develop if parasites were homogenized before intravenous injection, so that they were not arrested in the lungs.

Antibody levels, as measured by a hemagglutination technique, using whole larval extract as antigen, did not correlate closely with the eosinophil response.

The findings are interpreted as suggesting that increased eosinophil production is induced under some circumstances as a consequence of interaction between intact parasites and certain host cells in blood and tissue. No evidence was found for the existence of a specific constituent of the parasite capable of stimulating eosinophil production.

Attention is directed to features of eosinophilia which fit with the concept that this phenomenon belongs in the category of immunologic reactions.

Submitted on December 9, 1969


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS