The Journal of Experimental Medicine
Janeway's Immunobiology 7th Edition
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tripathy, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mackaness, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tripathy, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mackaness, G. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 130, 1-16, Copyright © 1969 by The Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

THE EFFECT OF CYTOTOXIC AGENTS ON THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE TO LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES

S. P. Tripathy M.D.1 and G. B. Mackaness M.B.1

1 From the Trudeau Institute, Saranac Lake, New York 12983

Four drugs, representing four different categories of cytotoxic agents, were studied for their effect on the immune response to Listeria infection in mice. The development of the host's immune response is revealed by a progressive change in the slope of the bacterial growth curve in spleen and liver. It has its onset at 24 hr in untreated mice, but in the presence of effective immunosuppression the organism multiples uninterruptedly until the animal dies from overwhelming infection. When administered as single injections at the time of infection, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, and azathioprine all produced an effective immunosuppression, characterized by continuous bacterial multiplication.

Methotrexate was also immunosuppressive, but unlike the others its effects were reversible. They could be sustained, however, by further treatment.

Studies of the time-response relationship indicated that cyclophosphamide was highly active over a broad time-span ranging from 2 days before infection to 4 days after infection. Vinblastine on the other hand was maximally active when given on the day of infection, while methotrexate had its greatest effect when given 48 hr after infection. These differences indicate that these three drugs act on different cell populations involved in the host's immune response. The effects observed have been discussed in relation to what is known of the modes of action of the drugs tested.

An observation of interest was the phenomenon of enhanced immunity in animals treated with cyclophosphamide or vinblastine 7–11 days before, and with methotrexate 4 days before infection; reactive hyperplasia of lymphoid tissue following withdrawal of drug was again advanced as an explanation for the occurrence of this paradoxical effect.

The experimental model employed is simple, requiring only routine bacteriological facilities and minimal equipment. It seems to offer a useful means of assessing the immunosuppressive activity of drugs and of determining the time-course of their action; it could also be of value in the screening of anticancer agents.

 Submitted on December 19, 1968


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS