The Journal of Experimental Medicine
MBL International Tel: 800.200.5459 CLICK HERE
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JEM
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubos, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaedler, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubos, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schaedler, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol 115, 1161-1172, Copyright, 1962, by The Rockefeller Institute


ARTICLE

THE EFFECT OF DIET ON THE FECAL BACTERIAL FLORA OF MICE AND ON THEIR RESISTANCE TO INFECTION

René J. Dubos Ph.D.1 and Russell W. Schaedler M.D.1

1 From the Rockefeller Institute

A study was made of the effect of certain dietary regimens on the lactobacillus flora in the stools of mice and on their resistance to infection.

Semi-synthetic diets with purified casein or wheat gluten as sole source of protein, gave rise to much smaller numbers of viable lactobacilli in the stools than did other diets containing unidentified natural products—as present for example in mixtures of whole wheat and whole milk, or in certain commercial pellets. Furthermore, one of the lactobacillus types with rhizoid morphology disappeared completely from the stools of animals fed the semi-synthetic diet.

The change in the lactobacillus flora became apparent within a very few days after the animals had been shifted from the complex to the synthetic diet Moreover, this change was not completely reversible. Whereas the total numbers of lactobacilli increased when the animals were shifted back from the synthetic to the complex diets, the rhizoid lactobacilli which had disappeared completely from the stools reappeared only slowly or not at all.

In twelve consecutive experiments the three diets which gave rise to the large numbers of lactobacilli in the stools also conferred on the mice a much higher resistance to experimental infection with Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae, than did the semi-synthetic diets. However, direct evidence has not yet been obtained that the two kinds of phenomena were causally related.

Following administration of endotoxin there was a rapid and very large increase in the numbers of enterococci and coliform bacilli in mice fed the semi-synthetic casein diet, but not in those fed the pellets.

In two preliminary experiments carried out with another colony of mice, not pathogen-free, it was also found that the rhizoid type of lactobacilli disappeared from animals fed the semi-synthetic casein diet while enterococci and coliform bacilli progressively increased in numbers under the same conditions.

The dietary effects on the lactobacillus flora, and on resistance to experimental infection, were equally pronounced whether the mice were housed in individual cages on wire grids, or grouped in larger cages with wood shavings as litter. This was true even if the bedding was changed only once weekly and became therefore grossly soiled.

Submitted on February 20, 1962


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search
TABLE OF CONTENTS